2001-2008
Home
Main
- About TFT
Friday Thing Archive
- Politics
- Media
- Culture and Society
- War On Terror
- People
- Places
- World
- Popped Clogs
- Music
- Books
- Film
- Etc
Help And Info
- Contact Details
- Advertising
- Jobs
- Privacy Policy
- XML Feed

Home > Culture and Society

Special consideration

15 May 2005

New guidelines set out this week by the Joint Council for Qualifications (JCQ) stipulate that in the future, pupils taking exams in times of personal hardship may have a few extra per cent added to their overall grade, partly just to cheer them up a bit, partly to attempt to balance out the horrid hand dealt them by a cruel and callous god. Isn't that nice? No-one could possibly piss and moan abut that, surely?

Enter Nick Seaton, chairman of the pressure group, Campaign for Real Education. Mr Seaton is not in favour of the move. He believes that it 'panders to the growing attitude in society that there is an excuse for everything. Youngsters should realise that bad things happen in life and it is important to deal with them.' He accepts that when a pupil is 'particularly distressed... a teacher can scribble a note on the exam paper, as happened in the past. But formalising and quantifying excuses in this way sends out the wrong message.'

There can be no doubt - that Nick Seaton is a hard, hard man. But he may well have a point. Claire Ellis of the Assessment and Qualifications Alliance (AQA) - which along with a bunch of other wholly necessary governing bodies, comprises the JCQ - has been charged with publicly defending the guidelines. She insists that pupils claiming 'special consideration' would be asked to prove their claim, so it wouldn't just be a case of pupils listing trauma and expecting a result-hike. But would they really insist on seeing a death certificate? It would seem a bit callous. But of course wholly necessary.

As to Seaton's point about already having a system in place to deal with the problem of traumatised examinees, Ms Ellis, surprisingly, couldn't agree more. It is 'nothing new', she admits. In the past, when a pupil has barely been able to complete an essay on the vital importance of being earnest because only that morning their grandmother had a lung removed, any invigilator worth his or her salt would scribble a mitigating note on the offending exam paper. Something like: 'Nan lost lung - +3%.' So, one is forced to wonder, what the devil is the point in formalising it so?

We have no idea. However, under the guidelines, there exists a trauma table, with the specific hardship of the pupil listed next to the percentage points it is deemed to deserve. A little like Top Trumps. So, for the recent death of a parent or close relative, a pupil can get an extra 5%. The recent death of distant family member is worth 4%. (And as any schoolchild knows, distant family members are especially useful.) Any pupil who has witnessed something as vague and universally applicable as 'a distressing event' on day of exam will gain an extra 3%. Students suffering from hay fever, 2%. Death of family pet on day of exam, 2%. Pet dies day before exam, 1%. Headache: 1%. We haven't made any of this up.

Apart from giving wily pupils something to aim for, the problem with drawing up lists is that the permutations are infinite. For example, what happens when some poor sod witnesses a parent or close relative confessing to a childhood sex trauma before setting fire to him or herself and three of his or her siblings at a pet's funeral? That's presumably worth something in the region of about 12%. Indeed, under the new guidelines it may be possible for a particularly unfortunate pupil to actually pass an exam without putting pen to paper.

In reality, all they really need to do is make everyone involved in the marking of examinations aware that mitigating circumstances might be rewarded with an extra percentage or two. Which, as everyone involved agrees, they already do. So, in conclusion, these new guidelines are nothing more than a giant waste of time and money.

Excellent.

F



Comment on this article: letters@thefridaything.co.uk

Subscribe to The Friday Thing for free


 ABOUT THE FRIDAY THING
Bad words ahead The Friday Thing is a weekly email comment sheet. Casting a cynical eye over the week's events, it is rarely fair and never balanced.

A selection of articles from each week's issue appear online, but to enjoy the full Thing, delivered by email every Friday - as well as access to almost five years of back issues - you'll need to subscribe. It's absolutely free.

READERS WRITE
"Razor-sharp comment and gossip." - The Sunday Times

"Hilariously cynical..To describe it as 'irreverent' is to do the newsletter an injustice." - The Observer

"Sharp, intelligent, opinionated, uncompromising and very, very funny. Just like 'Private Eye' used to be." - Alec McKelland

"Wicked" - Channel 4

"Ace" - Time Out

"'We rise once again in advocacy of The Friday Thing. We realize that some of you may be unwilling to spend [your money] on plain-text comment, but you're only depriving yourself." - The Minor Fall, The Major Lift

"Subscribing to this at the beginning of the year was undoubtedly one of the better decisions I've made. Superlative, and utterly marvellous. I look forward to Fridays now, because I can't wait for the next issue. Fucking fucking brilliant." - Meish.org

"Featuring writers from The Observer, Smack The Pony and The 11 O'Clock Show... will continue to attract new subscribers sight unseen" - NeedToKnow

"The Friday Thing is so good it's stopping me from doing a bunk of a Friday afternoon." - Annie Blinkhorn (The Erotic Review)

"So now" - The Evening Standard

"Damn it, you rule. May you never, ever back down." - Paul Mayze

"Ace" - PopJustice

"Snarky" - Online Journalism Review

"Can you please stop making me laugh out loud... I'm supposed to be working, you know!" - Tamsin Tyrwhitt

"Your coverage of stuff as it spills is right on the money." - Mike Woods

"Popbitch with A-Levels." - Tim Footman

"In an inbox full of trite work-related nonsense, TFT shines from under its subject heading like the sun out of Angus Deayton's arse." - Nikki Hunt

"A first rate email. It's become an integral part of my week, and my life would be empty and meaningless without it (well, *more* empty and meaningless anyway)." - Mark Pugh

"Genius, absolute bit of class. And you can quote me on that." - Lee Neville

"If you're hipper than hell, this is what you read." - MarketingSherpa

"The most entertaining email I've had all week. Great tone." - Matthew Prior

"A massive and engrossing wit injection." - idiotica.co.uk

"I wouldn't know satire if it bit me on the arse. But I did like the Naomi Campbell joke." - Matt Kelly (The Mirror)

"Has had an understandably high profile among people who know about these things." - Guy Clapperton (Guardian Online)

"Satirical sideswipes at the burning issues of the day." - Radio 5 Live

"Puerile and worthless... Truly fabulous... Do read the whole thing." - Stephen Pollard

The Friday Thing 2001-2008 - All Rights Reserved