2001-2008
Home
Main
- About TFT
Friday Thing Archive
- Politics
- Media
- Culture and Society
- War On Terror
- People
- Places
- World
- Popped Clogs
- Music
- Books
- Film
- Etc
Help And Info
- Contact Details
- Advertising
- Jobs
- Privacy Policy
- XML Feed

Home > Culture and Society

Torture: Not As Easy As It Sounds

12 December 2005

'We have seen what bleeding heart liberals have done to the West - created a soft environment where terrorists can act with impunity. Evil flourishes when good men do nothing, good men are now doing something.'
- Doug Pasmore, BBC Talking Points

...

When Condoleezza Rice backtracked on US-sponsored torture this week, admitting, grudgingly, that it might be a bad thing, what do you think really happened? Did she: A. Immediately issue instructions to the Pentagon instructing that all ‘extraordinary rendition’ operations should stop and people should no longer be sent to Syria to get their feet beaten to mush? Or was it: B. Say some vague, non-committal stuff about so-called ‘human rights’?

Clue: It wasn’t A.

But the torture debate is amazing simply because it’s taking place in the first place. Torture is one of the most ‘wrong’ things imaginable, along with murder, rape, paedophilia, genocide and other horrors. Despite this, torture remains popular. Despotic states use torture, not to get information, necessarily, but rather to break dissidents and scare the general population, or for the simple jobsworth reason that, hey, it’s how we’ve always done things. Nor is it any secret that liberal democracies have tacitly or explicitly supported torture, whether it’s the US and their chums in South America, the Brits in Northern Ireland (although in fairness it tended to be beatings rather than the electrode treatment) or the French in Algeria, who developed a genuine passion for torture.

(There’s a [true] story that French soldiers were so eager to torture that they zapped an Algerian terrorist with electric shocks for three days before realising that he had a piece of paper in his pocket with an address where fellow terrorists were building a bomb. When the house was finally raided, it was, oddly enough, deserted.)

In a child-like way, it’s really not too difficult to make a case for torture, without even having to be as specific as the ‘ticking bomb’ scenario promoted by the US government in the American media (a bomb is about to go off, a terrorist knows when and where, you have to torture them to prevent it, etc.) The argument is this: if someone, presumably a terrorist or supporter of terrorism, knows something that could avert a terrorist attack, then torturing that person clearly involves less suffering than a terrorist attack going ahead successfully.

It’s a simple utilitarian argument, and one with which most
people would agree at some level. Nor is it difficult to extend it to justify what the US already seems to have in place: an international interrogation network that uses harsh interrogation, some of which is clearly torture, because once you accept the basic argument, it doesn’t matter whether one person or 1,000 people are being tortured, so long as you keep preventing terrorist attacks.

Unfortunately, theory is different to practice. There are lots of arguments against torture: that it is simply morally wrong; torture victims will say anything to make the torture stop; it turns opinion against you; it dehumanises all involved and so on. But the overwhelming argument against torture in this instance is simply that there is no way that the US is likely to have good enough intelligence to avoid torturing thousands of innocent people.

Before you can even begin to justify torture, you have prove it’s useful. For torture to be useful against terrorists, you need three criteria to be met:

1) That your suspect is a genuine terrorist

2) That they actually have information that is useful

3) That those doing the torturing know whether information is
useful

Are these criteria likely to be met by the blundering US military? Of course not. In 2004 a USA Today editorial reported that Iraqi terrorist suspects were not being treated in accordance with the Geneva Convention and that ‘70% to 90% of the Iraqis swept up for interrogation were arrested by mistake, the International Committee of the Red Cross reported.’ Let’s mull that over again. 70 to 90 per cent were arrested by mistake. This is barely anti-terrorism or law enforcement, it’s just mass round-ups.

Even if the US government could make a case for torture, none in their right mind would trust US security services to get the right people. And this incompetence means that one of the most morally repugnant things imaginable, the torture of innocent people, is going on right now. And thanks to Tony Blair’s unwillingness to upset our American Special Relatives, the British government is standing shoulder to shoulder with the torturers.

Evil flourishes when good men do nothing.

We couldn't agree more.



Comment on this article: letters@thefridaything.co.uk

Subscribe to The Friday Thing for free


 ABOUT THE FRIDAY THING
Bad words ahead The Friday Thing is a weekly email comment sheet. Casting a cynical eye over the week's events, it is rarely fair and never balanced.

A selection of articles from each week's issue appear online, but to enjoy the full Thing, delivered by email every Friday - as well as access to almost five years of back issues - you'll need to subscribe. It's absolutely free.

READERS WRITE
"Razor-sharp comment and gossip." - The Sunday Times

"Hilariously cynical..To describe it as 'irreverent' is to do the newsletter an injustice." - The Observer

"Sharp, intelligent, opinionated, uncompromising and very, very funny. Just like 'Private Eye' used to be." - Alec McKelland

"Wicked" - Channel 4

"Ace" - Time Out

"'We rise once again in advocacy of The Friday Thing. We realize that some of you may be unwilling to spend [your money] on plain-text comment, but you're only depriving yourself." - The Minor Fall, The Major Lift

"Subscribing to this at the beginning of the year was undoubtedly one of the better decisions I've made. Superlative, and utterly marvellous. I look forward to Fridays now, because I can't wait for the next issue. Fucking fucking brilliant." - Meish.org

"Featuring writers from The Observer, Smack The Pony and The 11 O'Clock Show... will continue to attract new subscribers sight unseen" - NeedToKnow

"The Friday Thing is so good it's stopping me from doing a bunk of a Friday afternoon." - Annie Blinkhorn (The Erotic Review)

"So now" - The Evening Standard

"Damn it, you rule. May you never, ever back down." - Paul Mayze

"Ace" - PopJustice

"Snarky" - Online Journalism Review

"Can you please stop making me laugh out loud... I'm supposed to be working, you know!" - Tamsin Tyrwhitt

"Your coverage of stuff as it spills is right on the money." - Mike Woods

"Popbitch with A-Levels." - Tim Footman

"In an inbox full of trite work-related nonsense, TFT shines from under its subject heading like the sun out of Angus Deayton's arse." - Nikki Hunt

"A first rate email. It's become an integral part of my week, and my life would be empty and meaningless without it (well, *more* empty and meaningless anyway)." - Mark Pugh

"Genius, absolute bit of class. And you can quote me on that." - Lee Neville

"If you're hipper than hell, this is what you read." - MarketingSherpa

"The most entertaining email I've had all week. Great tone." - Matthew Prior

"A massive and engrossing wit injection." - idiotica.co.uk

"I wouldn't know satire if it bit me on the arse. But I did like the Naomi Campbell joke." - Matt Kelly (The Mirror)

"Has had an understandably high profile among people who know about these things." - Guy Clapperton (Guardian Online)

"Satirical sideswipes at the burning issues of the day." - Radio 5 Live

"Puerile and worthless... Truly fabulous... Do read the whole thing." - Stephen Pollard

© The Friday Thing 2001-2008 - All Rights Reserved