2001-2008
Home
Main
- About TFT
Friday Thing Archive
- Politics
- Media
- Culture and Society
- War On Terror
- People
- Places
- World
- Popped Clogs
- Music
- Books
- Film
- Etc
Help And Info
- Contact Details
- Advertising
- Jobs
- Privacy Policy
- XML Feed

Home > Politics

Hutton: revenge of the nerds

7 February 2004

The Hutton inquiry and subsequent report have been a gruesome triumph of nerdy detail over common sense - rather like producing a voluntary code of conduct for Turkish heroin gangs, and just as worthwhile.

Melanie McDonagh neatly summed up one aspect in the Observer:

"The very idea that the BBC might lose its independence because of inexact wording by a single reporter during a live broadcast lasting two and a half minutes at 6.07am - it's just silly."

Quite. Journalists get things wrong. Some of them get things wrong because they're arrogant little shits who subscribe to the cult of sensationalism. This isn't a new problem. It's not even a sackable one in most media outlets - look at the almost universal media hysteria over MMR jabs (an example where reliable scientific opinion repeatedly warned that the original research was deeply flawed).

Meanwhile those who supported the war in Iraq seem to miss the point, treating Hutton's report as a clean bill of health for the government, while ignoring much bigger issues that are staring them in the face. The (pro-war) Economist notes:

Alastair Campbell was cleared of any inappropriate interference with the dossier: it was reasonable for him to be involved in strengthening the wording of the document as long as Mr Scarlett accepted only changes that were consistent with the intelligence services' assessment.

But was it appropriate for Campbell to be 'strengthening' the wording in the first place? Campbell, it has been shown, is totally partisan and, on a personal level, bullish and aggressive. Given that the evidence for WMD was confused in the first place, it was an obvious opportunity to produce a dossier that told Tony Blair what he wanted to hear. Not necessarily by making things up or lying by omission (although that seemed to go on) but by tinkering with the precise meaning of various statements.

With a new, wider-ranging inquiry in the pipeline, maybe we'll discover what the relationship between politicians and the joint intelligence committee really is. But after Hutton, why bother?

In this case - by simple virtue of the fact that no WMD have been discovered - the intelligence quite clearly was not much good. In fact it was completely wrong. And yet it was acted on. It's like saying 'I know I failed my exams but I believed that the answers I was giving were right, and so I should have passed.' It's an argument that wouldn't wash with any GCSE exam board, and it
won't wash with people who (justifiably) believe that settling scores with Saddam was on Bush's agenda long before the issue of WMD came up.

And now Blair is arguing that any further inquiries must be limited in their scope and not address 'political' decisions about the war. Presumably decisions that might be in some way related to the question of why a prime minister who is desperate to be an international statesman and make his mark on history goes to war on obviously flawed intelligence to support a US president who could help advance his career and ego.

Cynical, maybe. But at least it's a real question, unlike Hutton's 'Who should take the blame for everything? The BBC, the BBC, or the BBC?'



Comment on this article: letters@thefridaything.co.uk

Subscribe to The Friday Thing for free


 ABOUT THE FRIDAY THING
Bad words ahead The Friday Thing is a weekly email comment sheet. Casting a cynical eye over the week's events, it is rarely fair and never balanced.

A selection of articles from each week's issue appear online, but to enjoy the full Thing, delivered by email every Friday - as well as access to almost five years of back issues - you'll need to subscribe. It's absolutely free.

READERS WRITE
"Razor-sharp comment and gossip." - The Sunday Times

"Hilariously cynical..To describe it as 'irreverent' is to do the newsletter an injustice." - The Observer

"Sharp, intelligent, opinionated, uncompromising and very, very funny. Just like 'Private Eye' used to be." - Alec McKelland

"Wicked" - Channel 4

"Ace" - Time Out

"'We rise once again in advocacy of The Friday Thing. We realize that some of you may be unwilling to spend [your money] on plain-text comment, but you're only depriving yourself." - The Minor Fall, The Major Lift

"Subscribing to this at the beginning of the year was undoubtedly one of the better decisions I've made. Superlative, and utterly marvellous. I look forward to Fridays now, because I can't wait for the next issue. Fucking fucking brilliant." - Meish.org

"Featuring writers from The Observer, Smack The Pony and The 11 O'Clock Show... will continue to attract new subscribers sight unseen" - NeedToKnow

"The Friday Thing is so good it's stopping me from doing a bunk of a Friday afternoon." - Annie Blinkhorn (The Erotic Review)

"So now" - The Evening Standard

"Damn it, you rule. May you never, ever back down." - Paul Mayze

"Ace" - PopJustice

"Snarky" - Online Journalism Review

"Can you please stop making me laugh out loud... I'm supposed to be working, you know!" - Tamsin Tyrwhitt

"Your coverage of stuff as it spills is right on the money." - Mike Woods

"Popbitch with A-Levels." - Tim Footman

"In an inbox full of trite work-related nonsense, TFT shines from under its subject heading like the sun out of Angus Deayton's arse." - Nikki Hunt

"A first rate email. It's become an integral part of my week, and my life would be empty and meaningless without it (well, *more* empty and meaningless anyway)." - Mark Pugh

"Genius, absolute bit of class. And you can quote me on that." - Lee Neville

"If you're hipper than hell, this is what you read." - MarketingSherpa

"The most entertaining email I've had all week. Great tone." - Matthew Prior

"A massive and engrossing wit injection." - idiotica.co.uk

"I wouldn't know satire if it bit me on the arse. But I did like the Naomi Campbell joke." - Matt Kelly (The Mirror)

"Has had an understandably high profile among people who know about these things." - Guy Clapperton (Guardian Online)

"Satirical sideswipes at the burning issues of the day." - Radio 5 Live

"Puerile and worthless... Truly fabulous... Do read the whole thing." - Stephen Pollard

The Friday Thing 2001-2008 - All Rights Reserved